anyanwu-35970-pc635231547814426017.pdf (2013)

Archived Content: This document is formally archived for historical reference. The original PDF remains the official record for legal purposes.

Need help? Please use the Assistance Request Form below.

Original PDF Document


Download Official Record (anyanwu-35970-pc635231547814426017.pdf)

Go to Top

Alternative Accessible HTML

Accessible Alternative: This HTML version is an automatically processed accessible alternative. While it provides a searchable format, the text extraction may contain formatting or character errors. The original PDF remains the authoritative official record.

Need a different format? Use the Request Assistance Form.

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
OF THE

-

SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
10 CADILLAC DRIVE. SUITE 220
BRENTWOOD, TENNESSEE 37027
TELEPHONE: [615) 361-7500
(BOD) 486-5714
FAX: (615) 367-2480
E-MAIL: ethics@tbpr.org
Website: www.tbpr.org

RELEASE OF INFORMATION
RE: BEDE O.M. ANYANWU. BPR #23293
CONTACT: ELIZABETH GARBER
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
615—361-7500
December 20, 2013
MADISON COUNTY LAWYER CENSURED
On December 18, 2013, Bede OM. Anyanwu, an attorney licensed to practice law in Tennessee,

received a Public Censure from the Board of Professional Responsibility of the Tennessee Supreme Court.
Although his wife was to be the buyer in a real estate transaction, Dr. Anyanwu represented the seller in
matters related to the transaction. Additionally, Dr. Anyanwu drafted documents related to the real estate

transaction which were misleading as to the true sales price of the property.
By these acts, Bede O. M. Anyanwu has violated Rules of Professional Conduct 1.2(d) (scope of
representation), 1.7 (conflict of interest), and 8.4(a), (b), and (c) (misconduct), and is hereby Publicly Censured
for this Violation.

A Public Censure is a rebuke and warning to the attorney, but it does not affect the attorney’s ability to

practice law.
Anyanwu 35970-7 rel.doc

PLEASE NOTE
YOU MAY SUBSCRIBE TO RECEIVE INFORMATIONAL RELEASES. FORMAL ETHICS
OPINIONS, NEWSLETTERS AND ANNUAL REPORTS ELECTRONICALLY BY SIGNING IN AT
THE BOARD’S WEBSITE
www.thLora/Subscriptions

IN DISOIPLINARY DISTRICT VII
' OF THE
'
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
OF THE
SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

EN RE: Berle OM. Anymrwu, #24293

FILE NO. 3597fln7—BG

an attorney licensed to practice law
in Tennessee.
(Madison Comrty)

PUBLIC CENSURE

The above complaint was filed against Bede OM. fimyenwu, an attorney lieensetl t0
practice law to Tetmeseee, alleging certain acts of misconduct, Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule
9, the Board of Professional Responsibility considered these matters at its meeting on Decemh er

6, 2013.
The Respondent‘s wife was purchasing reel estate which was encumbered-with liens
totaling $42,000. The Respondent agreed to represent the seller in negotiating one of the liens
with the lien-homer.

The seller subsequently discharged the Respomtent. The seller of the

property went to the Respondent’s office where she and the Respondent’s wife signed. a contract
for the sale of the property for $23,500, and signed e separate written agreement 'With a provislm
that within ten days of the sale of the property the Respondent’s Wife would pay six thousand
and five hundred dollars ($6,500) to the seller, lees one—third for Respondent’s attorney’s fees;

both of the executed decrements were drafted by the Respondent at the seller’s directive.
Consequently, the HUD Settlement Statement which Wes prepared by an um‘eletetl lawyer
reflected a purehase price of $28,500 rather then-$35,000. Alter the selling price was stated as
$28,500, one of the lien~holclers releesed its $16,000 lien. Ultimste‘ly, the Respondent’s wife

. refiised to pay the additional $6,500. In drafting the contract}: which failed to reflect the true

solos price, Respondent violated RFC 12(6) (allocation of authority), and RFC 8.4 (a), (b), 8:. (c)
(misconduct).

111 representing the seller when his wife was the buyer of the property,

Respondent had a conflict ofintorest in violation ofRPC 1.7.
By the aformnontionod oats, Bode O. M. Anyonwu, has violated. Rules of Professional
Conduct 1.2(d), 1.7, 8.4(3), 8.403); and 8.40:), and. is héroby Publicly Censored for theso
Violations.

FOR THE BOARD OF
PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

flaw Wham)
Leia Hoilabaugh,0hair U

Qua/774m; Mk 7,013
Date

Go to Top

Assistance Request

Request Accessibility Assistance

Go to Top