BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY (2007)

Archived Content: This document is formally archived for historical reference. The original PDF remains the official record for legal purposes.

Need help? Please use the Assistance Request Form below.

Original PDF Document


Download Official Record (blackard-28756c-6-rel633078348517303799.pdf)

Go to Top

Alternative Accessible HTML

Accessible Alternative: This HTML version is an automatically processed accessible alternative. While it provides a searchable format, the text extraction may contain formatting or character errors. The original PDF remains the authoritative official record.

Need a different format? Use the Request Assistance Form.

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
of the
SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
1101 KERMIT DRIVE, SUITE 730
NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37217
TELEPHONE: (615) 361-7500
(800) 486-5714
FAX: (615) 367-2480
E-MAIL: ethics@tbpr.org
Website: www.tbpr.org

RELEASE OF INFORMATION
RE: CHARLES G. BLACKARD, III, BPR #9899
CONTACT: CHARLES A. HIGH, DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
(615) 695-0929

February 23, 2007

BRENTWOOD TENNESSEE ATTORNEY CENSURED

Charles G. Blackard, III, a Brentwood, Tennessee, attorney was publicly censured by the Board of
Professional Responsibility on February 22, 2007. A public censure is a rebuke and warning to the attorney, but
it does not affect the attorney’s right to practice law.

Respondent represented a client in a domestic relations case for more than two (2) years. Complainant
was unable to communicate with Blackard by telephone or mail. After respondent withdrew, the client and
disciplinary counsel made numerous unsuccessful requests to retrieve the client’s file.

In another domestic relations matter, the complainant was unable to communicate with Blackard for
long periods of time. The complainant lived in a distant state and traveled to Tennessee for a hearing.
Complainant stated that Blackard was unprepared at the hearing and that he failed to issue subpoena witnesses
requested by the client. Respondent failed to respond to four (4) written requests by disciplinary counsel for a
response to the disciplinary complaint.

Respondent violated RPC 1.1 [competent representation], RPC 1.3 [diligence and promptness], RPC 1.4
[client communication], RPC 1.16(d) [duties on termination by client], and RPC 8.4(d) [conduct prejudicial to
the administration of justice.]

The rules of professional conduct are mandatory for all attorneys. They state a minimum level of
conduct and any violation reflects negatively on the standing and integrity of the bar.
Blackard 28756c-6 rel.doc

PLEASE NOTE

YOU MAY SUBSCRIBE TO RECEIVE INFORMATIONAL RELEASES, FORMAL ETHICS
OPINIONS, NEWSLETTERS AND ANNUAL REPORTS ELECTRONICALLY BY SIGNING IN AT THE
BOARD’S WEBSITE
www. tbpr.org/Subscriptions

Go to Top

Assistance Request

Request Accessibility Assistance

Go to Top