BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY (2012)
Archived Content: This document is formally archived for historical reference. The original PDF remains the official record for legal purposes.
Need help? Please use the Assistance Request Form below.
Original PDF Document
Download Official Record (artrip-2138-4-rel.pdf)
Alternative Accessible HTML
Accessible Alternative: This HTML version is an automatically processed accessible alternative. While it provides a searchable format, the text extraction may contain formatting or character errors. The original PDF remains the authoritative official record.
Need a different format? Use the Request Assistance Form.
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
OF THE
SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
10 CADILLAC DRIVE, SUITE 220
BRENTWOOD, TENNESSEE 37027
TELEPHONE: (615) 361-7500
(800) 486-5714
FAX: (615) 367-2480
E-MAIL: ethics@tbpr.org
Website: www.tbpr.org
RELEASE OF INFORMATION
DEREK A. ARTRIP, BPR #26784
CONTACT: KRISANN HODGES
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
615-361-7500
July 17, 2012
MURFREESBORO LAWYER TEMPORARILY SUSPENDED
On July 13, 2012, the Supreme Court of Tennessee issued an Order summarily and temporarily
suspending Derek A. Artrip from the practice of law upon finding that Mr. Artrip has failed to respond to the
Board regarding a complaint of misconduct. Section 4.3 of Supreme Court Rule 9 provides for the immediate
summary suspension of an attorney=s license to practice law in cases of an attorney=s failure to respond to the
Board regarding a complaint of misconduct.
Effective July 14, 2012, Mr. Artrip is precluded from accepting any new cases and he must cease
representing existing clients by August 13, 2012. After August 13, 2012, Mr. Artrip shall not use any indicia
of lawyer, legal assistant, or law clerk nor maintain a presence where the practice of law is conducted.
Mr. Artrip must notify all clients being represented in pending matters, as well as co-counsel and
opposing counsel of the Supreme Court=s Order suspending his law license. Section 18 of Supreme Court
Rule 9 requires Mr. Artrip to deliver to all clients any papers or property to which they are entitled.
This suspension remains in effect until dissolution or modification by the Supreme Court. Mr. Artrip
may for good cause request dissolution or modification of the suspension by petition to the Supreme Court.
Artrip 2138-4 rel.doc
PLEASE NOTE
YOU MAY SUBSCRIBE TO RECEIVE INFORMATIONAL RELEASES, FORMAL ETHICS
OPINIONS, NEWSLETTERS AND ANNUAL REPORTS ELECTRONICALLY BY SIGNING IN AT
THE BOARDâS WEBSITE
www.tbpr.org/Subscriptions