clark-33424-33520-33706-33842-33912-34022.pdf (2011)

Archived Content: This document is formally archived for historical reference. The original PDF remains the official record for legal purposes.

Need help? Please use the Assistance Request Form below.

Original PDF Document

Download Official Record (clark-33424-33520-33706-33842-33912-34022.pdf)

Go to Top

Alternative Accessible HTML

Accessible Alternative: This HTML version is an automatically processed accessible alternative. While it provides a searchable format, the text extraction may contain formatting or character errors. The original PDF remains the authoritative official record.

Need a different format? Use the Request Assistance Form.

WLEEETE
2&1! JUL 29 At? {3: Gt)
1N DiscrmeARY DISTRICT v
OF THE BOARD gs? marmgmm;
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Pï¬ï¬Ã©tï¬iti FY
OF THE
SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE âââââ MB. SEW

IN "RE: JOHN JAY CLARK, BPR NO. 24360 FILE NO. 33424~6~JV
Respondent, an attornay licensed 33520wï¬â3V
to practice law in Tennessee 33706Â«5~IV
33$42n5~JV
339126:le
34022~S~JV

PUBLIC CENSURB

The above complaints were ï¬led against John Jay Clark, an attorney licensed to practice

law in Tenmssee, alleging certain acts of misconduct. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 9, the

Board of Professiotial"Responsibility considered this mattczf at its meeting on June 10, 2011.

In separate cases, the Respondent dict not diligently pursue the. clientâs cause of action,

aclmowledgsd that in 2010 he negleï¬ed his duties as an attorney and failed to communicate

eï¬feoï¬vely, permitted the statute of limitations on :1 workersâ compansation case to lapse, failed

in communication with this client resulting in delay in the clientâs release from custody, and was