BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY (2015)

Archived Content: This document is formally archived for historical reference. The original PDF remains the official record for legal purposes.

Need help? Please use the Assistance Request Form below.

Original PDF Document


Download Official Record (martin-2467-9-rel.pdf)

Go to Top

Alternative Accessible HTML

Accessible Alternative: This HTML version is an automatically processed accessible alternative. While it provides a searchable format, the text extraction may contain formatting or character errors. The original PDF remains the authoritative official record.

Need a different format? Use the Request Assistance Form.

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
OF THE
SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
10 CADILLAC DRIVE, SUITE 220
BRENTWOOD, TENNESSEE 37027
TELEPHONE: (615) 361-7500
(800) 486-5714
FAX: (615) 367-2480
E-MAIL: ethics@tbpr.org
Website: www.tbpr.org

RELEASE OF INFORMATION
RE: VENITA MARIE MARTIN, BPR #17469
CONTACT: ALAN D. JOHNSON
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
615-361-7500

July 20, 2015

SHELBY COUNTY LAWYER TEMPORARILY SUSPENDED

On July 17, 2015, the Supreme Court of Tennessee temporarily suspended Venita Marie Martin from the
practice of law upon finding that Ms. Martin failed to respond to the Board regarding a complaint of
misconduct. Section 12.3 of Supreme Court Rule 9 provides for the immediate summary suspension of an
attorney’s license to practice law in cases of an attorney’s failure to respond to the Board regarding a complaint
of misconduct.

Ms. Martin is immediately precluded from accepting any new cases, and she must cease representing
existing clients by August 16, 2015. After August 16, 2015, Ms. Martin shall not use any indicia of lawyer,
legal assistant, or law clerk nor maintain a presence where the practice of law is conducted.

Ms. Martin must notify all clients being represented in pending matters, as well as co-counsel and
opposing counsel of the Supreme Court’s Order suspending her law license. Ms. Martin is required to deliver
to all clients any papers or property to which they are entitled.

This suspension remains in effect until dissolution or modification by the Supreme Court. Ms. Martin
may for good cause request dissolution or modification of the suspension by petition to the Supreme Court.

Martin 2467-9 rel.doc

Go to Top

Assistance Request

Request Accessibility Assistance

Go to Top