Zolensky 1360 rel.PDF (2003)

Archived Content: This document is formally archived for historical reference. The original PDF remains the official record for legal purposes.

Need help? Please use the Assistance Request Form below.

Original PDF Document


Download Official Record (013477-20030529.pdf)

Go to Top

Alternative Accessible HTML

Accessible Alternative: This HTML version is an automatically processed accessible alternative. While it provides a searchable format, the text extraction may contain formatting or character errors. The original PDF remains the authoritative official record.

Need a different format? Use the Request Assistance Form.

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
of the
SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
LANCE B. BRACY WILLIAM W. HUNT, III
CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL 1101 KERMIT DRIVE, SUITE 730 CHARLES A. HIGH
NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37217 SANDY GARRETT
LAURA L. CHASTAIN
DEPUTY CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL TELEPHONE: (615) 361-7500 JESSE D. JOSEPH
(800) 486-5714 JAMES A. VICK
BEVERLY P. SHARPE FAX: (615) 367- 2480 THERESA M. COSTONIS
CONSUMER COUNSEL/DIRECTOR E-MAIL: ethics@tbpr.org DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL

RELEASE OF INFORMATION
RE: DAVID M. ZOLENSKY, BPR #13477
CONTACT: SANDY GARRETT
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
615-361-7500

May 29, 2003

LAW LICENSE OF NASHVILLE ATTORNEY SUSPENDED

On May 19, 2003, the Supreme Court of Tennessee entered an order suspending the law
license of David M. Zolensky for a period of thirty days beginning May 19, 2003.

Zolensky was suspended by the Tennessee Supreme Court for Zolensky’s non-compliance
with Continuing Legal Education requirements beginning February 16, 2000. While suspended,
Zolensky represented a client in the Circuit Court for Davidson County, Tennessee. Specifically,
Zolensky filed an ans wer, filed an amended complaint, attended a case management conference,
served interrogatories, and participated in depositions while suspended. On September 20,
2002, Zolensky’s unauthorized practice of law was reported to the Board. Zolensky self-reported
his conduct to the Board on October 3, 2002.

The Board of Professional Responsibility filed a petition for discipline against Zolensky
pursuant to Rule 9, Rules of the Supreme Court of Tennessee. Zolensky submitted a conditional
guilty plea in excha nge for a stated form of discipline. The stated form of discipline was that
Zolensky would be suspended from the practice of law for a period of thirty days.
Zolensky’s suspension shall remain in effect until June 20, 2003.

From May 19, 2003 until June 20, 1993, Zolensky shall not use any indicia of lawyer, legal
assistant or law clerk, nor maintain a presence where the practice of law is conducted. Section
18 of Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 9 requires Zolensky to notify all clients that are being
represented in pending matters; all counsel and opposing counsel of the Supreme Court’s order
suspending him. Section 18 of Rule 9, Rules of the Supreme Court also Zolensky to deliver to all
clients any papers or property to which they are entitled.

SG:mw
Zolensky 1360 rel.doc

Go to Top

Assistance Request

Request Accessibility Assistance

Go to Top