BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY (2004)

Archived Content: This document is formally archived for historical reference. The original PDF remains the official record for legal purposes.

Need help? Please use the Assistance Request Form below.

Original PDF Document


Download Official Record (fox-1324-rel.pdf)

Go to Top

Alternative Accessible HTML

Accessible Alternative: This HTML version is an automatically processed accessible alternative. While it provides a searchable format, the text extraction may contain formatting or character errors. The original PDF remains the authoritative official record.

Need a different format? Use the Request Assistance Form.

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
of the
SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
LANCE B. BRACY WILLIAM W. HUNT, III
CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL 1101 KERMIT DRIVE, SUITE 730 CHARLES A. HIGH
NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37217 SANDY GARRETT
LAURA L. CHASTAIN TELEPHONE: (615) 361-7500 JESSE D. JOSEPH
DEPUTY CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
(800) 486-5714 JAMES A. VICK
FAX: (615) 367-2480 THERESA M. COSTONIS
BEVERLY P. SHARPE DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
CONSUMER COUNSEL DIRECTOR E-MAIL: ethics@tbpr.org

RELEASE OF INFORMATION
RE: CHRISTOPHER ROBIN FOX, BPR #16095
CONTACT: SANDY GARRETT
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
615-361-7500
February 17, 2004
NASHVILLE ATTORNEY DISBARRED

On January 15, 2002, the Supreme Court of Tennessee entered an Order temporarily suspending
Attorney Christopher Robin Fox from the practice of law for misappropriation of funds.

Beginning July 23, 2002, the Board of Professional Responsibility filed formal disciplinary
charges against Fox encompassing fourteen complaints. Fox failed to answer the Board’s formal
charges. Accordingly a hearing panel entered default judgments against Fox deeming admitted
the following charges:

Fox’s misappropriation of funds from clients;
Fox’s misappropriation of funds from multiple estates while the Public Administrator
for Wilson County, Tennessee;
Fox’s commingling of trust funds with personal funds;
Fox’s continued practice of law after being temporarily suspended;
Fox’s neglect of clients’ cases;
Fox’s failure to turn over client files, and
Fox’s failure to notify clients, courts, and opposing counsel of his temporary suspension.

On October 29, 2003, a hearing panel issued their default judgment recommending Fox be
disbarred. Fox did not appeal the hearing panel’s judgment, and on February 6, 2004, the
Supreme Court of Tennessee entered an order disbarring Fox. The Supreme Court adopted the
hearing panel’s recommendation that Fox should not be eligible for reinstatement to the practice
of law until Fox makes complete restitution to estates, clients, complainants, and Lawyers’ Fund
for Client Protection.

Fox’s disciplinary case was held pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 8 and 9. In Tennessee,
disbarred attorneys may after five years apply for reinstatement of their law licenses. To be
reinstated, Fox must show by clear and convincing evidence that his reinstatement would not be
detrimental to the integrity and standing of the bar or the administration of justice or subversive
to the public interest.

SG:mw
Fox 1324 rel.doc

Go to Top

Assistance Request

Request Accessibility Assistance

Go to Top