BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY (2014)

Archived Content: This document is formally archived for historical reference. The original PDF remains the official record for legal purposes.

Need help? Please use the Assistance Request Form below.

Original PDF Document


Download Official Record (nolan-2132-2-rel.pdf)

Go to Top

Alternative Accessible HTML

Accessible Alternative: This HTML version is an automatically processed accessible alternative. While it provides a searchable format, the text extraction may contain formatting or character errors. The original PDF remains the authoritative official record.

Need a different format? Use the Request Assistance Form.

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
OF THE

SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
10 CADILLAC DRIVE, SUITE 220
BRENTWOOD, TENNESSEE 37027
TELEPHONE: (615) 361-7500
(800) 486-5714
FAX: (615) 367-2480
E-MAIL: ethics@tbpr.org
Website: www.tbpr.org

RELEASE OF INFORMATION
RE: JOSEPH BRENT NOLAN, BPR #15237
CONTACT: WILLIAM C. MOODY
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
615-361-7500
December 1, 2014
KNOX COUNTY LAWYER SUSPENDED
On November 26, 2014, Joseph Brent Nolan, of Knoxville, Tennessee, was suspended from the practice
of law by Order of the Tennessee Supreme Court for two (2) years or indefinitely until restitution is completed.
The effective date of the Order is December 6, 2014. Mr. Nolan must pay restitution to three (3) clients in the
total amount of $69,599.54. If restitution is completed during the first year of the suspension, the second year
may be served on probation. If restitution is completed during the second year of the suspension, the remainder
of the second year may be served on probation. Mr. Nolan must pay the Board’s costs and expenses and the
court costs within ninety days of the entry of the Order of Enforcement.
The Board filed a Petition for Discipline on June 18, 2012, a Supplemental Petition for Discipline on
January 8, 2013, and a Second Supplemental Petition for Discipline on July 16, 2013. The petitions contained
eight (8) complaints of misconduct. Mr. Nolan delegated sole responsibility for management of his trust
account to his mother, a non-lawyer employee. She misappropriated client funds from his trust account without
his knowledge in order to pay the expenses of his law practice and other businesses owned by him. As a result,
a number of clients were significantly delayed in receiving the proceeds of their settlements and some never
received all the funds to which they were entitled. Payments owed to third parties were delayed or not made at
all. Mr. Nolan failed to communicate adequately with these clients and failed to provide them with timely,
accurate settlement statements. Mr. Nolan failed to adequately supervise his non-lawyer employee and failed to
maintain client funds in his trust account. He non-suited one case without consulting with his clients. Mr.
Nolan eventually left his private practice and became in-house counsel for a corporation. Mr. Nolan failed to
advise one client that he had done so, failed to communicate with that client and failed to properly withdraw
from his case. While employed as in-house counsel, Mr. Nolan improperly borrowed money from his
employer/client.
Mr. Nolan’s ethical misconduct violates Rules of Professional Conduct 1.2, Scope of Representation;
1.4, Communication; 1.5, Fees; 1.8, Conflict of Interest; 1.15, Safekeeping Property and Funds; 1.16, Declining
or Terminating Representation; and 8.4, Misconduct.
Mr. Nolan must comply with the requirements of Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 9, Sections 18 (2006)
and 30 (2014), regarding the obligations and responsibilities of suspended attorneys and the procedure for
reinstatement.
Nolan 2132-2 rel.doc

Go to Top

Assistance Request

Request Accessibility Assistance

Go to Top