BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY (2006)

Archived Content: This document is formally archived for historical reference. The original PDF remains the official record for legal purposes.

Need help? Please use the Assistance Request Form below.

Original PDF Document


Download Official Record (dunlap-1611-7-rel632973000273500261.pdf)

Go to Top

Alternative Accessible HTML

Accessible Alternative: This HTML version is an automatically processed accessible alternative. While it provides a searchable format, the text extraction may contain formatting or character errors. The original PDF remains the authoritative official record.

Need a different format? Use the Request Assistance Form.

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
of the
SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
1101 KERMIT DRIVE, SUITE 730
NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37217
TELEPHONE: (615) 361-7500
(800) 486-5714
FAX: (615) 367-2480
E-MAIL: ethics@tbpr.org
Website: www.tbpr.org

RELEASE OF INFORMATION
RICHARD L. DUNLAP, BPR #7830
CONTACT: SANDY GARRETT
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
615-361-7500

October 24, 2006

PARIS ATTORNEY CENSURED

On October 16, 2006, Richard L. Dunlap, of Paris, Tennessee, received a Public
Censure from the Tennessee Supreme Court. The Censure was based upon Dunlap’s entering a
Conditional Guilty Plea to a Petition for Discipline filed by the Board of Professional
Responsibility against Dunlap. On June 30, 2006, the Board of Professional Responsibility filed
a Petition for Discipline against Dunlap charging Dunlap with grabbing another attorney at the
Henry County Court Annex on December 15, 2005. Dunlap was charged with assault, a Class B
misdemeanor, which was resolved by Dunlap having no contact with the Complainant except in
open court and by Dunlap filing a letter of apology. The Board of Professional Responsibility
also charged Dunlap with writing a letter to a witness to the Henry County Court Annex incident
offering the witness temporary employment. Dunlap’s actions violate Rules 3.4, 8.1 and 8.4 of
the Tennessee Rules of Professional Conduct. The Censure declares Dunlap’s actions to be
improper ethical conduct but does not limit his right to practice law.

Dunlap 1611-7 rel.doc

PLEASE NOTE

YOU MAY SUBSCRIBE TO RECEIVE INFORMATIONAL RELEASES, FORMAL
ETHICS OPINIONS, NEWSLETTERS AND ANNUAL REPORTS ELECTRONICALLY BY
SIGNING IN AT THE BOARD’S WEBSITE
www. tbpr.org/Subscriptions

Go to Top

Assistance Request

Request Accessibility Assistance

Go to Top