65347737-6c22-4c4d-a277-4262426d5547.pdf (2016)
Archived Content: This document is formally archived for historical reference. The original PDF remains the official record for legal purposes.
Need help? Please use the Assistance Request Form below.
Original PDF Document
Download Official Record (sicay-perrow-2469.pdf)
Alternative Accessible HTML
Accessible Alternative: This HTML version is an automatically processed accessible alternative. While it provides a searchable format, the text extraction may contain formatting or character errors. The original PDF remains the authoritative official record.
Need a different format? Use the Request Assistance Form.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE
IN RE: DAVID SICAY-PERROW,BPR #27963
An Attorney Licensed to Practice Law in Tennessee
(Atlanta, Georgia)
FILED
JAN 26 2016
No. M2016-00152-SC-BAR-BP
BOPR No. 2015-2469-0-WM Clerk of the Courts
Rec'd By
ORDER OF ENFORCEMENT
This matter is before the Court upon a Petition for Discipline filed against David
Sicay-Perrow on July 20, 2015; upon Response to Board of Professional Responsibility's
Petition for Discipline filed by Mr. Sicay-Perrow on August 5, 2015; upon entry of a
Conditional Guilty Plea filed by Mr. Sicay-Perrow on December 23, 2015; upon an Order
Recommending Approval of Conditional Guilty Plea entered on December 29, 2015;
upon consideration and approval by the Board on January 4, 2016; and upon the entire
record in this cause.'
From all of which the Court approves the Order of the Hearing Panel and adopts
the Hearing Panel's Order Recommending Approval of Conditional Guilty Plea as the
Court's Order.
On August 19, 2015, Mr. Sicay-Perrow was administratively suspended by this
Court for failure to comply with continuing education requirements (Case No.
ADM2015-00050). To date, Mr. Sicay-Perrow has not requested, nor been granted
reinstatement.
IT IS, THEREFORE, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND
DECREED BY THE COURT THAT:
(1) Pursuant to Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 9, § 4.1, David Sicay-Perrow is disbarred.
(2) As a condition of reinstatement, Mr. Sicay-Perrow must be in compliance
with the terms of settlement agreements to which he is a party in Trustee Management
Company v. Sicay-Perrow, et al, No. 2014-CV-242323, and Fidelity Bank v. Sicay-
Perrow, et al, No. 2014CV243908, in the Superior Court ofFulton County Georgia.
'Because this matter was initiated prior to January 1, 2014, it is governed by Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 9 (2006) except as
otherwise noted.
(3) Additionally, Mr. Sicay-Perrow shall comply in all aspects with Tenn. Sup.
Ct. R. 9, §§ 18 (2006) and 30.4 (2014) regarding the obligations and responsibilities of
suspended attorneys and the procedure for reinstatement. Prior to seeking reinstatement,
Mr. Sicay-Perrow must meet all CLE requirements and have remitted all outstanding
registration fees and outstanding professional privilege taxes, including those due from
the date of this disbarment until the date of reinstatement.
(4) Further, the administrative suspension of August 19, 2015, for failure to
comply with continuing education requirements, in Case No. ADM2015-00050, shall
remain in effect pending further orders of this Court.
(5) Pursuant to Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 9, § 18.5, this Order shall be effective ten
(10) days after the date of entry.
(6) Pursuant to Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 9, § 24.3, Mr. Sicay-Perrow shall pay to the
Board of Professional Responsibility the expenses and costs of this matter in the amount
of $1,804.61 and shall pay to the Clerk of this Court the costs incurred herein, within
ninety (90) days of the entry of this Order, for all of which execution may issue if
necessary.
(7) The Board of Professional Responsibility shall cause notice of this
discipline to be published as required by Tenn. Sup. Ct. R.9,§ 18.10.
PER CURIAM