pettigrew-36946.pdf (2015)

Archived Content: This document is formally archived for historical reference. The original PDF remains the official record for legal purposes.

Need help? Please use the Assistance Request Form below.

Original PDF Document

Download Official Record (pettigrew-36946.pdf)

Go to Top

Alternative Accessible HTML

Accessible Alternative: This HTML version is an automatically processed accessible alternative. While it provides a searchable format, the text extraction may contain formatting or character errors. The original PDF remains the authoritative official record.

Need a different format? Use the Request Assistance Form.

IN DISCIPIJNARY DISTRICT I
OF THE
BOARD 0F PROFESSIONAL. RESPONSIBILITY
OF THE â
SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

IN RE: George Edwam 5â Pctï¬grcw, Respondmt, FILE NO. 369464-323
BPR# 25050, an attamey iieansed to
practice law in Tennessee.
(Ciaimee County}

PUBLIC CENSURE

The above complaint was ï¬led against George Edward S. Pettigrew, an attorney licensed in

practice law in Tennessee, allegiï¬g 96min acts sf miscanduct. PinsuÃ©nt m Supreme-Court Rule 9, the

Board of Professional Responsibility 90:333de mis matter at its meeting an Becamber. 12, 2914.

Mr. Pattigrew provided ï¬nancial assistance to his diam by providing her With the use of his

persmal mnemobï¬e while the clientâs cascs was pmding. Mr. Pettigraw falsely repurted to the Emmi

and falsely testiï¬eti befme the mutt that 116 had not laamd his gummobile t0 his clieni.

By the aforementioned acts, George Edward S. Patigrew, has violatad Rules of meessional

Conduct 1.8(3) (conï¬ict of interast), 3.3 (candor toward tribunal}, 8.301) (discipï¬nafy mattexs), and 8.4(a)