Eisenberg 1273 rel.PDF (2002)

Archived Content: This document is formally archived for historical reference. The original PDF remains the official record for legal purposes.

Need help? Please use the Assistance Request Form below.

Original PDF Document


Download Official Record (015417-20011221.pdf)

Go to Top

Alternative Accessible HTML

Accessible Alternative: This HTML version is an automatically processed accessible alternative. While it provides a searchable format, the text extraction may contain formatting or character errors. The original PDF remains the authoritative official record.

Need a different format? Use the Request Assistance Form.

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
OF THE
SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
1101 KERMIT DRIVE, SUITE 730 WILLIAM W. HUNT, III
NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37217 CHARLES A. HIGH
LANCE B. BRACY TELEPHONE: (615) 361-7500 SANDY GARRETT
CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL (800) 486-5714 JESSE D. JOSEPH
FAX: (615) 367-2480 JAMES A. VICK
LAURA L. CHASTAIN E-MAIL: ethics@tbpr.org THERESA M. COSTONIS
DEPUTY CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL

RELEASE OF INFORMATION
RE: GARY M. EISENBERG, BPR #15417
CONTACT: SANDY GARRETT
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
615-361-7500

December 21, 2001

CLARKSVILLE LAWYER TEMPORARILY SUSPENDED

On December 19, 2001 the Supreme Court of Tennessee issued an order summarily and
temporarily suspending Gary M. Eisenberg’s license to practice law, upon finding that Mr. Eisenberg had
failed to answer the Board of Professional Responsibility’s requests for information regarding a complaint
of misconduct. Section 4.3 of Supreme Court Rule 9 provides for the immediate summary suspension of
an attorney’s license to practice law in cases of failing to respond to the Board of Professional
Responsibility. Disciplinary Counsel filed a petition with the Supreme Court alleging that Mr. Eisenberg had
failed to respond to the Board’s requests for information regarding a complaint.

The December 19, 2001 order precludes Mr. Eisenberg from accepting any new cases effective
December 19, 2001. Mr. Eisenberg must cease representing existing clients effective January 18, 2002.
After January 18, 2002 Mr. Eisenberg shall not use any indicia of lawyer, legal assistant, or law clerk nor
maintain a presence where the practice of law is conducted.

The order requires Mr. Eisenberg to notify by registered or certified mail all clients being
represented in pending matters, as well as co-counsel and opposing counsel of the Supreme Court’s order
suspending his law license. Section 18 of Supreme Court Rule 9 requires Mr. Eisenberg to deliver to all
clients any papers or property to which they are entitled.

This suspension remains in effect until dissolution or modification by the Supreme Court. Mr.
Eisenberg may for good cause request dissolution or modification of the suspension by petition to the
Supreme Court.

SG:mw

Eisenberg 1273 rel.doc

Go to Top

Assistance Request

Request Accessibility Assistance

Go to Top