henry-31799c-and-32605-2-public-censure.pdf (2010)

Archived Content: This document is formally archived for historical reference. The original PDF remains the official record for legal purposes.

Need help? Please use the Assistance Request Form below.

Original PDF Document


Download Official Record (henry-31799c-and-32605-2-public-censure.pdf)

Go to Top

Alternative Accessible HTML

Accessible Alternative: This HTML version is an automatically processed accessible alternative. While it provides a searchable format, the text extraction may contain formatting or character errors. The original PDF remains the authoritative official record.

Need a different format? Use the Request Assistance Form.

BO HD 01"PHOFESSFIONAL ' ESPONSIBILITY
_

WU]: T OF TENNESSEE
-

IN DISCIPLINARY DISTRICT 11 W
__. -_ __-¢_b__— __.”.mr—m:

OF THE Executive Secretary
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY .
OF THE
SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

IN RE: ARTHUR HENRY, BPR NO. 9484- FILE NOS. 317990—2—PS and 326050-2-PS
Respondent, an attorney licensed
to practice law in Tennessee ‘
(Loudon County)

' PUBLIC CENSURE

The above complaint was filed against Arthur Henry, an attorney licensed to. practice law

in Tennessee, alleging certain acts of misconduot. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 9, the Board

of Professional Responsibility considered these matters at its meeting on March 12, 2010.

The Respondent represented two separate Complainants who bought model homes and

subsequently disCOVered that the houses were built on a sinkhole. The Complainants wanted to

file suit against the developer of the subdivision. The ReSpOndent admits after he was informed

by an expert that the damages in the cases were minimal, he did not want to pursue the case.

After October of 2008, he seemed to communicate with the Complainant, despite the fact that

they sent him numerous emails and left him several telephone messages inquiring about the

status of their cases. In fact, the Respondent failed to inform the Complainants that he was

terminating the representation. Respondent never sent the Complainants copies of any reports or

other paperwork or a billing statement. Respondent also failed to comply withDisciplinary

Counsel’s repeated requests for additional information.

By the aforementioned facts, Arthur Henry has violated Rules of Professional Conduct

1.3 (diligence), 1.4 (communication), 1.16 (declining and terminating representation), and 8.1(b)
'(failure to comply with disciplinary toquests) and is hereby Publicly Censored for these

violations.

B‘bR THE OF
/rl’ROFB /I¢N LRE‘SP'OfiSIBIL
/
TY

Go to Top

Assistance Request

Request Accessibility Assistance

Go to Top