bell-32472-2-public-censure.pdf (2009)
Archived Content: This document is formally archived for historical reference. The original PDF remains the official record for legal purposes.
Need help? Please use the Assistance Request Form below.
Original PDF Document
Download Official Record (bell-32472-2-public-censure.pdf)
Alternative Accessible HTML
Accessible Alternative: This HTML version is an automatically processed accessible alternative. While it provides a searchable format, the text extraction may contain formatting or character errors. The original PDF remains the authoritative official record.
Need a different format? Use the Request Assistance Form.
u... âmumâ.âA'Juânlnl uââ.. -..'_.-.:=. f.
\ -(â
MLIIED
somect ERGIIEIISIUNAL RESPONSIBILITY
II ccurIT/IILIENNESSEE
scatters
1N DISCIPLJNARY DISTRICT JI
OF THE Executwe Secretary â
BOARD or PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
. _ OF THE
' SUPREME COURT OF remisssaa
IN RE. JAMES A. H. BELL, BPR NO. 775 FILE NO. ~32472~2~KB
.Respondent, an attorney licensed
to practice law'In Tennessee
(Knox County)
PUBLIC came-Rn
The above complaint was filed against James A. H. Bell, an attorney licensed to practice law
in Tennessee, alleging certain acts of misconduct. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 9, the Board of
Professional Responsibility considered this matter at its meeting on December 11, 2009.
. On August 13, 2009, U. S. Magisttate Judge Clifford Shirley, Jr., U. 3. District Court,
EasteInDistrict of Tennessee, found Respondent in criminal contempt beyond a reasonable doubt for
misrepresentations made with the intent to obstruct the business ofthe Couit and. the administration
.._I._
of justice. U. S. Magistrate Judge Shirleyâ s opmion was timely forwarded to the Be ard by the
-|.
Respondent, and this Ifact Was regarded by the Board as a self-rep01t Thatcourt heid that
__
Respondent had intentionally, willfully and knowingly made misrepresentations about a meeting
with a person who later was a co-defendant in a criminal case in which Respondent represented
. another ccâdefendant. That court speciï¬cally found that the misrepresentations were not honest
mistakes based on a ï¬awed memory or mistaken belief. That court ï¬ned Resp endent the niaxiintrm
cf$5,000. The court stated that â[T]his occurrence appears to be acneâtime blemish onIan oï¬IeIWise
lengthy and commendable record of legal representation.â
âBy the eforem'eï¬aoned Opinion of the court, James A. H. Bell has violated Rules of
Professional Conduct 3,3(a)(1) and 8.4(69 and is hereby Publicly Censured for those Violations: .
On 1111;} 14, 2009, the Board had previously dismissed the Respondentâs earlier selfâreport of
the matter addressed by U.IS. Magistrate Judge Shirley.
//
Râageâ7é§s,oh ix '
Date
3 W: o «