The Board of Professional Responsibility will be closed on Friday, April 3rd, 2026 in observance of Good Friday. 

 

Search Results

1 - 25 of 74

90-F-123 - DHS attorneys' child support services

Inquiry is made by the General Counsel for the Tennessee Department of Human Services (DHS) concerning the potential ethical conflicts and ethical responsibilities of attorneys employed in programs administered by DHS pursuant to Title IV-D of

80-F-1 - Structured Settlements

Clarification on the conflict of interest that arises from the fee interest potential of structured settlements is so inherently conducive to divided loyalties as to amount to a conflict of interest with the client.

80-F-1 - Structured Settlements

This Ethics Committee of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Tennessee has been requested to consider the propriety of structured settlement offers by insurance carriers or their attorneys to plaintiff's attorneys.

93-F-132 - Vacated*

Inquiry is made concerning the ethical propriety of an attorney becoming an in-house employeeattorney to represent and defend the insureds of the employer-insurer.

96-F-140 - Appointed Counsel for Minor in Abortion Case

Inquiry is made as to several issues involving the ethical obligations of court-appointed counsel for minors who obtain abortions via judicial bypass of the parental consent for abortion provisions within Tennessee Code Annotated (T.C.A.) §§37-1

99-F-143 - Insurance company directing attorney

Inquiry regarding the propriety of a lawyer who is appointed by an insurance company to defend an insured, permitting the insurance company to hire outside auditors to audit the legal expenses of the attorney and to give directives relative to his defense of the insured.

81-F-4 - County Attorney

Whether or not a member of a law firm could serve as county attorney while his firm engaged in a comprehensive general practice, a considerable portion of which involved the representation of land developers in the county.

81-F-6 - Fee Dispute with Client

Generally, fee disputes are beyond the scope of consideration in ethical matters because they are questions of law not ethics; however, ethics may be involved when attorney fees are excessive, illegal or improperly divided with another.

2000-F-145 - Insurance Company Directing Attorney

Inquiry is made regarding the ethical propriety of defense attorneys retained by insurance companies to represent the insurance company’s insureds, taking the following actions in tort cases, solely because the insurance company directs them t

2002-F-107(b) - Governmental Attorneys

In all matters involving governmental interests and differing interests except for the question of district attorneys' and state prosecutors' ability to represent criminal defendants, the question of a conflict of interest is a factual one

2002-F-146 - Part time District Attorneys

Inquiry is made regarding the ethical propriety of part-time Assistant District Attorneys’ representation of criminal defendants within the same judicial district.

2005-F-151 - Memphis Pilot Program

Lawyers have concerns about ethical responsibilities while employed by a legal services organization in a pilot program intended to provide limited legal services to otherwise pro se litigants.

81-F-9 - Former Client

Can an attorney properly represent an insurance company in an action against the attorney's former client to recover proceeds paid for failure of the former client to cooperate with payment of the proceeds.